City A “City” range test is specified to determine riding range during “stop-and-go” operation typically found in urban areas. This estimate is provided following the SAE J2982 Riding Range Test Procedure for On-Highway Electric Motorcycles to provide a reasonable and consistent basis for manufacturers to inform prospective owners of the riding range that can be expected under specified operating conditions. Actual range will vary based upon riding conditions and habits. |
157 miles (253 km) | 196 miles (315 km) |
Highway, 55 mph (89 km/h) This is meant to provide a range value that riders can expect to achieve when riding their motorcycle on a highway at a steady speed of 55 mph (89 km/h) according to the SAE J2982 Riding Range Test Procedure. Actual range will vary based upon riding conditions and habits. |
88 miles (142 km) | 110 miles (177 km) |
» Combined The combined or “Highway Commuting” range calculation procedure is specified to determine riding range in urban areas when operation consists of 50% stop-and-go operation and 50% operation on urban freeways under levels of congestion that allow for quasi-steady speeds of 55 mph (89 km/h). This estimate is provided following the SAE J2982 Riding Range Test Procedure. Actual range will vary based upon riding conditions and habits. |
112 miles (180 km) | 141 miles (227 km) |
Highway, 70 mph (113 km/h) This is meant to provide a range value that riders can expect to achieve when riding their motorcycle on a highway at a steady speed of 70 mph (113 km/h) according to the SAE J2982 Riding Range Test Procedure. Actual range will vary based upon riding conditions and habits. |
64 miles (103 km) | 80 miles (129 km) |
» Combined The combined or “Highway Commuting” range calculation procedure is specified to determine riding range in urban areas when operation consists of 50% stop-and-go operation and 50% operation on urban freeways under levels of congestion that allow for quasi-steady speeds of 70 mph (113 km/h). This estimate is provided following the SAE J2982 Riding Range Test Procedure. Actual range will vary based upon riding conditions and habits. |
91 miles (146 km) | 114 miles (183 km) |
Motor
|
Peak torque |
116 ft-lb (157 Nm) | 116 ft-lb (157 Nm) |
Peak power Peak power the motor can produce for a finite period of time. Actual power output may vary depending on a number of conditions, including operating temperature and state of charge. |
70 hp (52 kW) @ 3,500 rpm | 70 hp (52 kW) @ 3,500 rpm |
Top speed (max) The top speed is based on the results of government regulated standardized testing known as homologation. Actual top speed may vary according to riding conditions and the battery's state-of-charge. |
102 mph (164 km/h) | 102 mph (164 km/h) |
Top speed (sustained) The sustained top speed is that which the motorcycle can be expected to hold for an extended period of time. This sustained top speed may vary according to riding conditions. |
90 mph (145 km/h) | 90 mph (145 km/h) |
Type |
Z-Force® 75-7R passively air-cooled, high efficiency, radial flux, interior permanent hi-temp magnet, brushless motor | Z-Force® 75-7R passively air-cooled, high efficiency, radial flux, interior permanent hi-temp magnet, brushless motor |
Controller An electric motorcycle's controller is akin to a gas bike's fuel injection system. It precisely "meters" the flow of electricity from the battery to the motor according to the action of the rider's throttle and surrounding conditions, via a sophisticated map algorithm. |
High efficiency, 775 amp, 3-phase brushless controller with regenerative deceleration | High efficiency, 775 amp, 3-phase brushless controller with regenerative deceleration |
Power system
|
Power pack |
Z-Force® Li-Ion intelligent integrated | Z-Force® Li-Ion intelligent integrated |
Max capacityMaximum capacity tends to be the electric vehicle industry’s choice for reporting the maximum amount of energy that can be stored in a vehicle’s power pack.
About kWh : Where gasoline vehicles use gallons, electric vehicles frequently use kilowatt hours (kWh) to measure the total possible ‘fuel’ or energy storage capacity.
The Formula:
Maximum kWh = (# of cells) * (cell Amp-hour capacity rating) * (cell max voltage rating)
|
14.4 kWh | 18.0 kWh |
Nominal capacityNominal capacity is the most accurate measure of the amount of usable energy that can be stored in a vehicle’s power pack. It differs from maximum capacity because it is calculated using an average voltage that is more often ‘the norm’ rather than a maximum which is rarely seen.
About kWh: Where gasoline vehicles use gallons, electric vehicles frequently use kilowatt hours (kWh) to measure the total possible ‘fuel’ or energy storage capacity.
The Formula:
Nominal kWh = (# of cells) * (cell Amp-hour capacity rating) * (cell nominal voltage rating)
|
12.6 kWh | 15.8 kWh |
Charger type |
1.3 kW, integrated | 1.3 kW, integrated |
Charge time (standard)Typical charge time using the motorcycle's on-board charger and a standard 110 V or 220 V outlet.
Note that charge times to 95% are referenced for two reasons. First, with normal use, it’s rare that a power pack would be discharged to 0%. Second, "topping off" from 95% to 100% takes 30 minutes, regardless of charging method, in order to maximize battery capacity. |
9.8 hours (100% charged) / 9.3 hours (95% charged) | 12.1 hours (100% charged) / 11.6 hours (95% charged) |
» With Charge Tank option The Zero S, Zero SR, Zero DS, and Zero DSR can charge up to 6x faster than when using standard, Level 1, 110 V outlets. This breakthrough comes your way courtesy of a game changing 6 kW Charge Tank option. The technology makes it possible to power up a Zero S or Zero DS ZF7.2 in about one hour, or larger batteries in about two hours using Level 2 charge stations. |
2.5 hours (100% charged) / 2.0 hours (95% charged) | N/A |
» With one accessory charger
Zero's scalable charging accessories allow customers to add multiple standalone chargers (in addition to the existing on-board unit) for up to a ~75% reduction in charge time, depending on the model and year.
Zero Motorcycles generally recommends that only one charger be plugged into one circuit, including the motorcycle's on-board charger. Plugging multiple chargers into a single circuit risks drawing too much power, thereby activating the source's circuit breaker.
Some household circuits—including many in Europe—operate at high enough capacities to power multiple chargers. It is the customer's responsibility to first verify that any given power source is rated at high enough output to safely support the load of a charger or chargers.
Zero motorcycles' on-board chargers draw up to 1500W (Zero DSRP) or 800W (Zero FXP). Off-board accessory chargers draw up to 1200W.
|
5.7 hours (100% charged) / 5.2 hours (95% charged) | 7.0 hours (100% charged) / 6.5 hours (95% charged) |
» With max accessory chargers
Zero's scalable charging accessories allow customers to add multiple standalone chargers (in addition to the existing on-board unit) for up to a ~75% reduction in charge time, depending on the model and year.
Zero Motorcycles generally recommends that only one charger be plugged into one circuit, including the motorcycle's on-board charger. Plugging multiple chargers into a single circuit risks drawing too much power, thereby activating the source's circuit breaker.
Some household circuits—including many in Europe—operate at high enough capacities to power multiple chargers. It is the customer's responsibility to first verify that any given power source is rated at high enough output to safely support the load of a charger or chargers.
Zero motorcycles' on-board chargers draw up to 1500W (Zero DSRP) or 800W (Zero FXP). Off-board accessory chargers draw up to 1200W.
For 2019 motorcycles, the max number of accessory chargers is:
Zero DSRP = 4
Zero FXP 7.2 = 4
|
2.8 hours (100% charged) / 2.3 hours (95% charged) | 3.3 hours (100% charged) / 2.8 hours (95% charged) |
Input |
Standard 110 V or 220 V | Standard 110 V or 220 V |
Drivetrain
|
Transmission |
Clutchless direct drive | Clutchless direct drive |
Final drive |
90T / 20T, Poly Chain® HTD® Carbon™ belt | 90T / 20T, Poly Chain® HTD® Carbon™ belt |
Chassis / Suspension / Brakes
|
Front suspension |
Showa 41 mm inverted cartridge forks, with adjustable spring preload, compression and rebound damping | Showa 41 mm inverted cartridge forks, with adjustable spring preload, compression and rebound damping |
Rear suspension |
Showa 40 mm piston, piggy-back reservoir shock with adjustable spring preload, compression and rebound damping | Showa 40 mm piston, piggy-back reservoir shock with adjustable spring preload, compression and rebound damping |
Front suspension travel Wheel travel, measured along fork-line. |
7.00 in (178 mm) | 7.00 in (178 mm) |
Rear suspension travel Wheel travel, measured perpendicular to ground. |
7.03 in (179 mm) | 7.03 in (179 mm) |
Front brakes |
Bosch Gen 9 ABS, J-Juan asymmetric dual piston floating caliper, 320 x 5 mm disc | Bosch Gen 9 ABS, J-Juan asymmetric dual piston floating caliper, 320 x 5 mm disc |
Rear brakes |
Bosch Gen 9 ABS, J-Juan single piston floating caliper, 240 x 4.5 mm disc | Bosch Gen 9 ABS, J-Juan single piston floating caliper, 240 x 4.5 mm disc |
Front tire |
Pirelli MT-60 100/90-19 | Pirelli MT-60 100/90-19 |
Rear tire |
Pirelli MT-60 130/80-17 | Pirelli MT-60 130/80-17 |
Front wheel |
2.50 x 19 | 2.50 x 19 |
Rear wheel |
3.50 x 17 | 3.50 x 17 |
Dimensions
|
Wheelbase The distance from where the front tire contacts the ground to where the back tire contacts the ground without any additional weight on the motorcycle (Unladen). |
56.2 in (1,427 mm) | 56.2 in (1,427 mm) |
Seat height The distance from the ground to the top of the seat without any additional weight on the motorcycle (Unladen). |
33.2 in (843 mm) | 33.2 in (843 mm) |
Rake At ride height (1/3 suspension sag) |
26.5° | 26.5° |
Trail At ride height (1/3 suspension sag) |
4.6 in (117 mm) | 4.6 in (117 mm) |
Weight
|
Curb weight |
443 lb (201 kg) | 487 lb (221 kg) |
Carrying capacity |
332 lb (151 kg) | 288 lb (131 kg) |
Economy
|
Equivalent fuel economy (city)Electric vehicle fuel economy is measured in Miles Per Gallon equivalent (MPGe) which indicates, via an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prescribed formula, how far an electric vehicle can go using the same amount of energy as is contained in one gallon of gasoline. Electric vehicles are much more efficient than their internal combustion engine (ICE) counterparts. An electric vehicle powertrain can turn above 90% of the energy supplied to it into usable motive power. An ICE powertrain can only turn about 25-30% of its supplied energy into motive power. The result is that an electric vehicle powertrain can operate at over three times the efficiency of its ICE counterparts.
The Formula:
Equivalent Fuel Economy, City = (EPA UDDS range) / (Power Pack nominal capacity) x 33.7 (EPA kWh per gallon of gasoline)
Equivalent Fuel Economy, Highway = (Highway range) / (Power Pack nominal capacity) x 33.7 (EPA kWh per gallon of gasoline)
|
419 MPGe (0.56 l/100 km) | 419 MPGe (0.56 l/100 km) |
Equivalent fuel economy (highway)Electric vehicle fuel economy is measured in Miles Per Gallon equivalent (MPGe) which indicates, via an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prescribed formula, how far an electric vehicle can go using the same amount of energy as is contained in one gallon of gasoline. Electric vehicles are much more efficient than their internal combustion engine (ICE) counterparts. An electric vehicle powertrain can turn above 90% of the energy supplied to it into usable motive power. An ICE powertrain can only turn about 25-30% of its supplied energy into motive power. The result is that an electric vehicle powertrain can operate at over three times the efficiency of its ICE counterparts.
The Formula:
Equivalent Fuel Economy, City = (EPA UDDS range) / (Power Pack nominal capacity) x 33.7 (EPA kWh per gallon of gasoline)
Equivalent Fuel Economy, Highway = (Highway range) / (Power Pack nominal capacity) x 33.7 (EPA kWh per gallon of gasoline)
|
172 MPGe (1.37 l/100 km) | 172 MPGe (1.37 l/100 km) |
Typical cost to rechargeThis indicates the average cost to recharge a fully drained power pack. More often, riders will be charging a partially drained power pack and will have a lower cost of recharge. The actual cost of recharging will always be dictated by the amount of charge put into the power pack and the cost of electricity flowing from the particular outlet.
The Formula:
Typical cost to recharge = (Average consumer cost per KWh) X (Power Pack nominal capacity) / (charging efficiency).
Charging efficiency is 0.94 for all 2013-later models.
|
$1.61 | $2.02 |